Friday, October 23, 2009

Whether to Buy a Condo or Not...

These days it's not easy owning a condo, or any house located in a community that requires homeowners to pay fees. As more owners in these communities feel financially pinched, many aren't paying dues. That means residents who keep up with the bills have to pay a bigger share of the burden—and if there aren't enough reserves to pay to replace worn-out roofs or fix a cracked sidewalk, they face the possibility of bumped-up dues or an unexpected special assessment.

On the flipside, prices are low. And for the brave home buyer, there are bargains out there. The trick is looking closely at the homeowner association's health. Buyers need to question the association board about dues payments, and have their inspectors examine common elements before committing to a purchase. It's also important to review the financial documents that every buyer has a right to inspect before closing.

But what should you be looking for? We asked Leonard Baron, professor of finance at San Diego State University, for some tips:

  • Make sure you get all the documents, and have sufficient time to look them over. Buyers are supposed to get all financial documents relating to the association during their inspection period, but often they arrive, incomplete, just a day or two before closing. That's not enough time to review documents that may be many pages long. So Prof. Baron advises that you bug your agent for them the minute your home goes into escrow, and demand at least three days to review them.
  • Check the financial statement. About two-thirds of the association's budget should be operating expenses such as water, lights, elevator maintenance and landscaping; the rest should be set aside in a reserve fund for long-term maintenance and repairs. See if expenses exceed revenues due to foreclosures, unpaid dues or other reasons. If they do, ask the association what their plans are to make up the shortfall, and whether you should expect an assessment or higher dues. Ask also if there are plans to save costs by cutting pool hours, or the number of mowings or clubhouse cleanings. This could affect not only your comfort, but also the future marketability of your home.
  • Review the reserve study. Not every state requires these, but they are becoming more common. For such a study, the association will hire an outside firm that will look at all long-term anticipated repairs and replacements over a period of 30 years, add up the costs, and put together a payment and maintenance schedule. The monthly dues you're charged should reflect the amount of money that needs to be put away to pay for these necessities, but you shouldn't simply assume that's happening. "Many times the boards, under pressure by the owners, will hold the line on raising fees, to the long-term detriment of the property," he says.
  • See what percentage of reserve funds has been raised. In an ideal world, associations would save enough money over time to pay for every contingency. So if the roofs on 100 condo units will need to be repaired in 12 years at a cost of $240,000, for the reserve to be 100% funded after six years, half of that sum would need to have been put away for that purpose. But in the real world, associations often rob their own reserve funds to pay for operating and other expenses; Prof. Baron estimates that most are only funded 50% or less. Although the percentage of funding necessary varies by the age and size of a complex, (for instance a skyscraper with a complex mechanical system is much higher maintenance than a small townhouse community) in general, you should be wary if funding is below 40%. "You could be hit with thousands of dollars in assessments if something expensive fails," he says.

Source: WSJ, October 11, 2009, written by: June Fletcher

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

Why You Should Buy a Home Now...

Here is a great article from Duane Gomer on "Why You Should Buy a Home Now"

Let’s discuss two California families and the real estate market. We’ll call them Able and Baker.

Able sold a home at the top of the real estate market for $500,000 and bought a new home for $800,000, paying 10% down and getting a new adjustable rate mortgage for the remainder. Baker stayed in their existing $500,000 home and we all applauded Able for selling at the top of the market.

There are many different opinions on the amount of the drop in prices but we can all agree prices have dropped, more in some areas than others. For our example, we will use a simplified 35% drop on all homes.

Today, Able is in their home with a loan still around $720,000 and can’t refinance because their value is $520,000. Their property taxes are still hovering around $8,000 per year. This is called being underwater, and they could be facing tax problems because of forgiveness of debt, etc.

Baker decides to sell today and finally move up to a bigger home. Their home has dropped in value and they think they have suffered a loss of $175,000 as the home is worth only $325,000. They sell and buy the former $800,000 home for $520,000. They get a loan for $468,000 at the current rate of under 5% and their taxes will be about $5,200 per year.

They might also qualify for a $8,000 tax credit and other inducements in today’s market. Also, there could be appreciation as the market recovers and would you rather have appreciation start now on a $325,000 home or a $520,000 home? Plus they’re living in their move-up home and the family is happy. So, who is better off now. Able or Baker?

Remember the old real estate advantage. Sell when everyone is greedy and buy when everyone is needy. Yes, I know the really smart thing to do would have been to sell three years ago and rent until now. Did many people do that? I don’t think so.

We can go back in time only in the movies and it’s too late for could’ve, should’ve or would’ve. Hey, we all misread the economy then so let’s move now and not misread it again. If you want to move up to a better home and can afford it, consider doing it now. Remember the $8,000 tax credit sunsets December 1st.


Source: Duane Gomer

Renting vs. Buying

Here is a great article I received from Duane Gomer on Renting vs. Buying. I think he does a great job of breaking down the cost/benefit of each...

Yes, buying real estate is a big commitment but many times not buying real estate is a bigger mistake. Let’s compare the costs of renting a property in today’s market versus buying the same property today.

First to establish an example. My figures will work with any example, but let’s use a home that would rent for $2,000 a month or would sell for $400,000 at 3% down.

What would your cost per year be to buy when compared to the $24,000 you would pay in rent?


Let’s use very oversimplified figures:

Interest: 5% on $388,000 = $19,400
Property Taxes = $ 4,000
Insurance = $ 1,000
$24,400

There are other factors to consider. For example, IRS tax relief for the deductible items above. Let’s use a 25% IRS tax rate and an 8% California tax rate. Interest and property tax payments are deductible so 33% of the $23,400 would result in a tax savings of $7,722. That brings the outlay each year to $16,678. That is less than renting.

Yes, there are other variables such as the interest deduction in later years will drop plus property taxes and insurance will increase, but rents will also rise. There will be expenses such as repairs to be paid by the owner but this could be offset by appreciation as real estate markets return to normal.

The major point of this posting is that the tax benefits of ownership are important when budgeting for yearly housing costs, as are future appreciation plus your pride of ownership so consider buying now not later.

Source: Duane Gomer www.DuaneGomer.com

Monday, October 05, 2009

Bathroom Upgrades Pay Off

More than 80 percent of new single-family homes have at least two bathrooms, which occupy an average of 300 square feet of floor space, or 12 percent of the total area, according to a study by the National Association of Home Builders.

The home builder’s study reports a major return on value for extra bathrooms: "When the number of bathrooms is approximately equal to the number of bedrooms, an additional half-bath adds about 10 percent to the home's value, and one additional bath adds about 19 percent."

A mid-range bathroom remodel, which costs $10,500 on average nationwide, repays a home buyer at least 100 percent of the outlay when the property is sold, the home buyer study concludes.

Source: Chicago Tribune, Mike McClintock (09/21/2009)